#+TITLE: Assignment Two #+AUTHOR: Logan Hunt #+STARTUP: entitiespretty fold inlineimages #+LATEX_HEADER: \notindent \notag \usepackage{ dsfont } \usepackage{amsmath} #+LATEX: \setlength\parindent{0pt} * Section 1.3 ** Question 3 701, 1009, 1949, 1951 are all prime ** Question 7 \begin{align*} p | a \Rightarrow np &= a \\ p | a + bc \Rightarrow mp &= a + bc \\ mp &= np + bc \\ mp - np &= bc \\ p(m - n) &= bc \end{align*} Since $bc$ is a multiple of $p$, and $p$ is prime, by Theorem 1.5, $p | b$ or $p | c$. ** Question 15 If $p | a^n \Rightarrow p | a \cdot a \dotsc a$ then by corollary 1.6, $p | a$. Then, $a = pm$ and $a^n = p^n \cdot m^n$. $p^n$ is a factor of $a^n$ and thus $p^n | a^n$. ** Question 17 From the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, both $a$ and $b$ must be a product of primes such that $a = (p \cdot p_1 \cdot p_2 \dotsc p_i)$ and $b = (p \cdot q_1 \cdot q_2 \dotsc q_j)$ with each $p_i$ and $q_j$ being prime. Then, $a^2 = (p \cdot p_1 \cdot p_2 \dotsc p_r) \cdot (p \cdot p_1 \cdot p_2 \dots p_r)$ and $b^2 = (p \cdot q_1 \cdot q_2 \dotsc q_j) \cdot (p \cdot q_1 \cdot q_2 \dotsc q_j)$. $p^2$ is then a common factor of $a^2$ and $b^2$, and since each other factor ($p_i^2$, $q_i^2$) is a square of a prime, there can be no other greater common divisor than $p^2$. Therefore, $(a, b) = p \Rightarrow (a^2, b^2) = p^2$ when p is prime. ** Question 30 *** a Firstly assume that there are $a,b \ni a^2 = 2b^2$. Then, $a^2 = p_1 p_2 \dotsc p_r$ and $2b^2 = q_1 q_2 \dotsc q_s$, and by the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, every $p_i = \pm q_j$. Since $a^2$ is even as it is equal to $2b^2$, let $p_1$ be the factor corresponding to a power of $2$. Then $p_1 = 2^n$ and $n$ must be a multiple of $2$ since $a^2 = 2^n \dotsc \Rightarrow a = 2^{\frac{n}{2}} \dotsc$ However, $2b^2 = \pm 2^n \dotsc$ implies that $b^2 = \pm 2^{n-1} \dotsc$ and from similar reasoning $n-1$ must also be a multiple of $2$. This is a contradiction - not both $n$ and $n-1$ can be multiples of $2$! *** b Just reformat it: \begin{equation*} \sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b} \Rightarrow 2 = \frac{a^2}{b^2} \Rightarrow 2b^2 = a^2 \end{equation*} * Section 2.1 ** Question 2 *** a \begin{equation*} 6k + 5 \equiv_4 6 + 5 \equiv_4 11 \equiv_4 3 \end{equation*} *** b \begin{equation*} 2r + 3s \equiv_{10} 2(3) + 3(-7) \equiv_{10} 6 - 21 \equiv_{10} -15 \equiv_{10} 5 \end{equation*} ** Question 3b \begin{align*} & 10(0) + 9(0) + 8(3) + 7(1) + 6(1) + 5(0) + 4(5) + 3(5) + 2(9) + 5 \\ &\equiv_{11 }24 + 7 + 6 + 20 + 15 + 18 + 5 \\ &\equiv_{11} 95 \\ &\equiv_{11} 7 \end{align*} Invalid ISBN ** Question 5 *** a Theorem 2.2 states that if $a \equiv_4 b$, and $c \equiv_4 d$, then $ac \equiv_4 bd$. Since $5 \equiv_4 1$ and $5 \cdot 5 \equiv_4 1 \cdot 1$, then $5 \cdot 5 \cdot 5 \equiv_4 1 \cdot 1 \cdot 1$. We can continue chaining these together until we find $5^{2000} \equiv_4 1^{2000}$, and thus [5^{2000}] = [1] in $\mathds{Z}_4$. *** b By repeating the same process as in a, $4 \equiv_5 4$ and $4^2 \equiv_5 1$. Then, $4^3 \equiv_5 4 \cdot 1$. Then, $4^4 \equiv_5 4^2 \Rightarrow 4^4 \equiv_5 1$. In general as we keep chaining on and because of Theorem 2.2, even powers of 4 will be equivalent mod 5 to 1, and odd powers of 4 will be equivalent mod 5 to 4. Therefore, $4^{2001} \equiv_5 1$ and $[4^{2001}] = [1]$ in $\mathds{Z}_5$. ** Question 7 If $a \in \mathds{Z}$ then $a \equiv_4 m$ with $m \in {1,2,3,4}$. Then, by Theorem 2.2 again, $a^2 \equiv_4 m^2$. $[m^2] \in \mathds{Z}_4$ must be equivalent to any ${[1^2], [2^2], [3^2], [4^2]} = {[1], [0], [1], [0]}$. Therefore, $[a^2]$ cannot be in ${[3], [4]} \subset {[2], [3], [4]}$ ** Question 14 *** a A simple python script will prove this is false: \begin{verbatim} seen = set() for n in range(1, 10): for a in range(0, 10): for b in range(0, 10): seenfoo = (a, b, n) in seen or (b, a, n) in seen if (a * b) % n == 0 and a % n != 0 and b % n != 0 and not seenfoo: seen.add((a, b, n)) print(f"a={a}, b={b}, n={n}") \end{verbatim} And we receive several counterexamples: \begin{verbatim} a=2, b=2, n=4 a=2, b=6, n=4 a=6, b=6, n=4 a=2, b=3, n=6 a=2, b=9, n=6 ... a=2, b=4, n=8 a=4, b=6, n=8 a=3, b=3, n=9 a=3, b=6, n=9 a=6, b=6, n=9 \end{verbatim} *** b If $ab \equiv_n 0$, then $ab = mn + 0$ for some $m \in \mathds{Z}$ by definition. Then, $ab = mn$ implies that $ab$ is a multiple of $n$, and since $n$ is prime, then by Theorem 1.8, $n | ab$ implies that $n | a$ or $n | b$.